Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice.

Early career researchers (ECRs) are important stakeholders leading efforts to catalyze systemic change in research culture and practice. Here, we summarize the outputs from a virtual unconventional conference (unconference), which brought together 54 invited experts from 20 countries with extensive experience in ECR initiatives designed to improve the culture and practice of science. Together, we drafted 2 sets of recommendations for (1) ECRs directly involved in initiatives or activities to change research culture and practice; and (2) stakeholders who wish to support ECRs in these efforts. Importantly, these points apply to ECRs working to promote change on a systemic level, not only those improving aspects of their own work. In both sets of recommendations, we underline the importance of incentivizing and providing time and resources for systems-level science improvement activities, including ECRs in organizational decision-making processes, and working to dismantle structural barriers to participation for marginalized groups. We further highlight obstacles that ECRs face when working to promote reform, as well as proposed solutions and examples of current best practices. The abstract and recommendations for stakeholders are available in Dutch, German, Greek (abstract only), Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, and Serbian.

S043 mythbuster: truncal vagotomy and gastric drainage procedures.

INTRODUCTION: You are sitting for your oral surgery board exam and the examiner asks what you do when you realize that you have accidentally cut the posterior vagus nerve during a hiatal hernia repair. Is the answer to proceed with a gastric drainage procedure correct? The prevailing dogma seems to be that inadvertent vagotomy will produce gastric stasis/paresis and the stomach will not empty and hence should be accompanied by a gastric drainage procedure. This report presents clinical outcomes of 49 patients who underwent truncal vagotomy without a drainage procedure (pyloroplasty or gastrojejunostomy). METHODS: 49 patients underwent truncal vagotomy with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in an IRB (Investigational Review Board)-approved clinical trial to determine if the addition of a vagotomy would increase achieved weight loss when compared to gastric banding alone. The details of this trial were presented at SAGES (Martin and Earle in Surg Endosc 25:2522-2525, 2011) in 2010. The patients in this study have been followed for over ten years and their histories were examined to look for evidence of gastric stasis or intractable diarrhea or if they required further surgery for these complaints. RESULTS: 49 patients have been followed for a mean of 10.9 years. All except one have experienced a loss of hunger and cessation of gastric borborygmus. One patient showed mild delayed gastric emptying after developing diabetes. Two other patients with DM carry a diagnosis of gastroparesis. No patient has experienced intractable diarrhea. Five patients have had revisions to sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass for weight loss failure or esophageal dilatation and GERD. CONCLUSIONS: Review of these truncal vagotomy patients without drainage procedures at 10 years does not support the myth that the stomach will not empty after vagotomy and a gastric drainage procedure should always accompany truncal vagotomy.